Use of Funds Slide: Structure & Real Examples From Startups

TL;DR

The use of funds slide isn't a budget summary. It's a strategic argument. Four real startup use of funds slide examples — Artisan, Hype, Seam.so, and micro1 — show how different approaches work at different stages. What they all share: a clear connection between capital and outcome.

• Every category should answer: what specifically happens, and what does it unlock?
• Match your format to your stage — pre-seed needs milestone clarity more than financial precision
• Design for a 10-second read — investors are averaging under 2.5 minutes per deck

What Do Investors Actually Look for on a Use of Funds Slide?

Most founders build the use of funds slide last. The deck is almost done – problem, market, traction, team – and then someone says, "shouldn't we add a slide about the money?" That sequencing is the first mistake. Because this slide isn't a footnote. It's a test. And when it's built as an afterthought, it reads like one.

Use of Funds slide exists for specificity and logic. Not a polished infographic. Not five decimal places of precision. A clear answer to a very simple question — if I give you this money, what changes, and when?

DocSend's 2024 slide-level data (via PitchGrade) found investors spent approximately 52 seconds on financial slides — second only to the team slide at just over a minute. When an investor is genuinely interested, they slow down here. Which means a vague or hard-to-parse slide isn't just weak — it actively erodes confidence at the worst possible moment.

‍

‍

What investors consistently want to see:

• Total raise amount — stated clearly, not buried in the subtext
• 3–5 spending categories — with both dollar amounts and percentages
• Runway — how long does this round buy you?
• Milestones unlocked — what will you be able to prove by the time you raise again?

That last point is the one most founders skip. And it's the one that matters most. Investors aren't just evaluating where the money goes — they're evaluating whether you understand what it needs to accomplish.

How Should You Structure a Use of Funds Slide?

The structure that works — consistently, across stages — is simpler than most founders expect.

‍

‍

Start with the total ask and runway. One line at the top: Raising $3M / 18-month runway. Investors should never have to hunt for the headline number.

Break spend into 3–5 categories. More than five and the slide becomes a spreadsheet. Fewer than three and it looks undercooked. Each category needs:

• A specific label (not a generic function name)
• A dollar amount
• A percentage
• A one-line note on what it funds and why the sequencing is right

Add a milestone layer. This is what converts a budget into a narrative. What will you have achieved when this round is spent? What can you prove to your next investor that you can't prove today?

A clean format that holds up at most stages:

‍

‍

We worked with a fintech founder — early traction, differentiated product, a team worth backing. But his use of funds slide was a single donut chart with four unlabeled segments, no amounts, no timeline, no milestones. Every investor follow-up included the same question: "What exactly are you planning to do with the money?" That question shouldn't survive past the deck.

We rebuilt the slide around three specific hires, a clear product milestone, and a 16-month runway. The follow-up conversations shifted immediately from "tell me more about your plan" to "walk me through the product roadmap."

‍

Real Use of Funds Slide Examples: What These Startups Got Right

Looking at real funded decks is more instructive than any framework. Four use of funds slide examples — pre-seed through Series A — each taking a different approach, each working for a specific reason.

Artisan — Pre-Seed, $2–4M: The Multi-Stage Roadmap Format

Artisan's slide doesn't just show use of funds for the current raise. It maps capital deployment across three stages: Pre-Seed ($2–4M), Series A, and Series B — laying out what each round builds toward before later amounts are even determined.

Why this works: At pre-seed, investors aren't funding a complete plan. They're funding a team's ability to think clearly about what needs to happen and in what sequence. Artisan's slide answers that. Pre-seed: build the founding team, launch three product SKUs, begin automating the sales cycle, launch the app store in closed beta. Series A: expand the product catalog, ramp R&D, develop proprietary models, open the full app store. Series B: scale to hundreds of products, achieve feature parity with major SaaS players.

No percentages. No dollar breakdowns per category. But the milestone logic is airtight, and at this stage, that matters more than financial precision. Investors can see the compounding rationale. They can evaluate whether the founder has thought about the journey, not just the immediate ask.

The design choice: Three equal-weight cards, one per round. The amount is prominent on the current raise, "TBC" for the others, honest about uncertainty without being vague about intent.

What to borrow: If you're pre-seed and your plan is still evolving, a stage-based format with strong milestone logic can be more credible than a premature allocation table.

micro1 — Pre-Seed, $1.1M: The Single-Thesis Slide

micro1 went as minimal as a use of funds slide can go — and made it work. The headline states the raise and valuation directly. The subtitle does the strategic heavy lifting: "To manage the crazy demand and speed up product development."Then three bullets: 3x product development speed, hire 2–3 more sales people, hire 1–2 more recruiters.

Why this works: This slide has a thesis, not a budget. The subtitle isn't filler. It answers the investor's silent question before they ask it: why now, why this amount, why these hires? Demand exists. The constraint is capacity. The raise removes the constraint.

At pre-seed, that argument is often more convincing than a detailed allocation table. Investors funding early-stage companies aren't evaluating your Q3 headcount plan with precision. They're evaluating your judgment about what the business needs right now.

The design choice: Dark background, centered layout, one contained box for the specifics. The visual weight lands entirely on the raise amount and the thesis line, exactly where it should.

What to borrow: Lead with WHY before you show WHAT. If you have a clear demand signal, make it the frame for the entire slide. The strategic rationale belongs in the headline, not in a footnote.

Seam.so — Seed, $2.5M: The Strategic Ask Format

Seam.so's slide is titled "The Ask"  and it reframes the concept entirely. Instead of one ask, there are three columns: a financial ask (capital for full-time engineers to build the marketplace), a strategic ask (partnership introductions with IP-focused NFT projects and web3 games), and an operational ask (token launch support, audits, legal advising, and tokenomics).

Why this works: In web3 fundraising, the right investors bring more than capital. Seam.so is raising from people who can unlock specific ecosystems, and the slide makes that explicit. It signals to investors: we know what you're worth beyond the check.

This format also demonstrates sophisticated fundraising thinking. Founders who can articulate what they need from investors — strategically, not just financially — tend to build better investor relationships. The slide earns credibility by showing self-awareness about what the codmpany actually needs to move forward.

The design choice: Clean white grid layout, high-contrast heading, three-column structure. Equal visual weight for financial and non-financial asks, reinforcing that both matter.

What to borrow: If your investors bring strategic value that's genuinely important (network, partnerships, technical credibility) consider making that explicit. It differentiates your raise and shows you've thought about fit, not just capital.

Hype — Series A, $10M: The Visual-First Allocation

Hype's slide leads with the headline in bold all-caps, unmissable, and uses a large donut chart to communicate allocation at a glance: 55% R&D, 27% Marketing, 19% Other.

Why this works (and where it could be stronger): At Series A, the assumption is that product-market fit is established. The R&D-heavy allocation sends a clear signal: we're scaling the product, not the brand. That's the right message for this stage, and it lands fast visually.

The donut chart earns its place here because the split is large enough to read clearly — 55/27/19 is immediately legible in a way that similar-sized slices would not be. The headline, chart, and legend communicate in sequence within seconds.

The weakness worth noting: "19% Other" is the one vague element on an otherwise confident slide. At Series A, investors have enough financial sophistication to notice it — and to wonder what it's covering. A more specific third category (G&A, reserve, partnerships) would close that gap without cluttering the slide.

What to borrow: Donut charts work when your category split is significant and your labels are meaningful. Pair them with a strong headline and keep legends minimal. If you have a catch-all category, name it more specifically: "Other" is the one word that quietly undermines an otherwise clean slide.

These four use of funds slide examples show there's no single right format. What they share is intentionality, each slide reflects a deliberate choice about what the investor needs to understand, and how fast they need to understand it. For more on how stage shapes structure, see our roundup of pre-seed pitch deck examples.

What Are the Most Common Mistakes on a Pitch Deck Use of Funds Slide?

The mistakes cluster around the same root problem: treating this slide as a budget rather than a business argument.

Vague category labels. "Sales," "Marketing," "Operations" with no detail on what actually happens. Pitch Guide's 2024 analysis is unambiguous: the difference between a weak slide and a strong one comes down to specificity. Their test: "$200,000 to hire a head of sales and two agents by Q4, focused on winning our five target accounts" beats "20% for sales" in every scenario.

No milestone connection. The spend is listed, but there's no answer to "so what?" Investors are evaluating stewardship, whether your plan converts capital into meaningful progress. Categories without outcomes make the ask feel arbitrary.

Wrong stage logic. Heavy brand spend before product-market fit. A large team buildout before repeatable sales. The sequencing matters. A well-built use of funds slide shows you understand what needs to happen first.

Too much visual complexity. DocSend's 2023 year-end data clocked average investor time per deck at 2 minutes 24 seconds, an all-time low. An ornate, hard-to-parse chart doesn't signal sophistication. It signals that you made the investor work harder than they needed to.

Disconnection from the rest of the deck. The use of funds slide doesn't live in isolation. It should echo your problem and solution narrative, reinforce your market size argument, and justify the number on your ask slide. When those threads are loose, the whole story frays.

‍

‍

When Should You Leave the Use of Funds Slide Out of Your Deck?

Some founders, particularly those sharing decks widely via cold outreach, choose to omit the use of funds slide from the distributed version. The logic is sound: a detailed breakdown exposes your operational plan and can date badly if priorities shift before the round closes.

The practical approach most experienced operators land on: two versions. A leaner deck for broad distribution, which might fold use of funds into the ask slide as a brief summary. And a fuller version for live meetings and diligence, where you walk through the detail in context.

What you shouldn't do is skip the thinking entirely. Investors will ask. You need the answer ready, specific, and defensible, whether it lives on a slide or not.

VCWire's mid-2024 analysis of DocSend data tracked pitch deck interactions up 19.2% year over year. More decks are in circulation. The bar for financial clarity keeps rising. Founders who treat the use of funds slide as a checkbox are competing against founders who treat it as a strategic argument. That gap shows up in investor conversations, and eventually in term sheets.

The founders who close rounds aren't always the ones with the most traction or the most polished design. They're the ones who've thought carefully about what they're asking for, why they need it now, and what it's going to get them. The use of funds slide, done right, answers all three. In one slide. In under 10 seconds.

If you're preparing for a raise and not sure your deck is telling the right story, we're happy to talk it through. No pressure. Just a conversation about where you are and what would actually help.

‍